http://eatingsandwiches.com/
NAVIGATION:
Is it easy to navigate or difficult?
Its pretty easy if you understand what it’s for. On the homepage it doesn’t have the side bar with all the categories of items. But if you click into any of the work posted it comes up in the next page. So if you were wanting to search something that would be a little tricky unto you got to the second page. Also, they don’t have a button that says home, you just have to know to click on the eating sandwiches word at the top.
Does the designer use a metaphor to get you to move through the website?
Its in chronological order on the home page, but then after that page you can control the subject of artwork in the side bar.
What kind of metaphor are used?
1. Organizational metaphors = organized by type, kind, ect.
2. Functional metaphors = performs a “real world” function (in Photoshop you can
figuratively “cut” and “paste”)
3. Visual metaphor = common graphic elements familiar to most – the traditional
“play,” “fast forward,” and “rewind” buttons found on CD player.
INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE:
Does the information in the site make sense?
Yeah, it just displays some neat happenings in the art relem.
Can you access the content you want easily?
Semi easy, you have to click into a poster work on the first page and then it will go into the side bar with the categories and search bar.
How is the content organized? (by location, alphabet, timeline, category, ect.?)
Chronologically, so maybe time line?
Is there visual and content hierarchy that allows you to easily understand and access the information presented to you?
Not really, its just in the chronological order and then seperates into cetain cadigories.
USABILITY
Is this site easy to use?
Pretty simple to use, I think if you were new to it and were searching for a posted work it would be hard to find the search bar unless you knew where it was.
How do the two above concepts, (navigation and information architecture) work in terms of making the site usable or not? So the metaphors make sense with the content?
Yeah they are trying to get across a chronological, alphabetical, orderly message about the work.
Overall, does the site sustain your interest and engagement?
Yeah it would be good to see what’s going on in the world of design.
MEANING-MAKING:
In what was is the designer creating meaning in this site?
Not really, just trying to get up artwork in a neutral, nonhierarchical, fair way for people to view.
Are they using metaphor?
Organizational metaphor
Is there a narrative story or event that unfold over time?
Not really all all.
Is this narrative linear, non-linear, or multi-linear?
Its linear because the worked is ordered by which is was posted in time.
REFLECTION OF THE USER:
Is there a reflection of you, as the user, on this site? Does it change according to your specific visit? Do you receive mouse feedback? Text feedback? Does the site store any choices you have made? Are you engaged enough in the site to linger and explore?
There isn’t any reflection of the user shown in this site, I am engaged in this site because it host a variety of work and by category so I can view what I like.
TRANSPARENCY OF DESIGN:
Does the design of the site lead you to pay more attention to the content or to the design itself? Does the design feel transparent or “natural,: leading you to focus on the content and forget the design completely or is attention called more to the design itself?
The site is so neutral to accommodate for the work being posted. They want to work to be highlighted not the website - so they have to have a neutral work that fits for everything that gets posted.
Does the transparency or lack of transparency of the design make sense with what the site is intending to do?
Yes, it does for the reason exampled one question ago


















